README VERSION : 1.0 README Creation Date : 2012-02-08 Patch-ID : 143682-04 Patch Name : VRTSglm 5.1SP1RP2P1 BASE PACKAGE NAME : VRTSglm BASE PACKAGE VERSION : 5.1 Obsolete Patches : NONE Superseded Patches : 143682-03 Required Patches : NONE Incompatible Patches : NONE Supported PADV : sol10_x86 (P-Platform , A-Architecture , D-Distribution , V-Version) Patch Category : OTHER Reboot Required : YES Patch Installation Instructions: -------------------------------- For Solaris 2.0-2.6 releases, refer to the Install.info file and/or the README within the patch for instructions on using the generic ''installpatch'' and ''backoutpatch'' scripts provided with each patch. For Solaris 7-9 releases, refer to the man pages for instructions on using ''patchadd'' and ''patchrm'' scripts provided with Solaris. Any other special or non-generic installation instructions should be described below as special instructions. The following example installs a patch to a standalone machine: example# patchadd /var/spool/patch/143682-04 Patch Uninstallation Instructions: ---------------------------------- The following example removes a patch from a standalone system: example# patchrm 143682-04 For additional examples please see the appropriate man pages. Special Instructions: --------------------- NONE KNOWN ISSUES : FIXED INCIDENTS: ---------------- Patch Id::143682-04 This GLM patch contains internal fix. Patch Id::143682-03 * Incident no::2406572 Tracking ID ::2146573 Symptom::Customer reported this as performance issue. The application was running slower when this problem happens. The SAR utility on HP-UX was showing some processes in PRI state. Description::(1) Complexity: This is an extremely complex performance concern in an environment where different applications are in great competition for the same system-wide resources. (2) Performance overheads: Competition for system resources is expected. However intense competition can create large overheads due to increased repetitive initialization. We approached this issue in multiple ways. Provided customer some tuning and application changes. Resolution::No product bug was identified from Symantec side. However a GLM patch was provided to customer which does two things. 1. Different names given to different GLM spin locks. So that we can identify various locks from spin watcher output. 2. We take avoiding a spinlock which keeps accounting if how many times allocation did in GLM. Removing this lock will not cause any regression. Also, we have not said that it will solve this performance problem. * Incident no::2554253 Tracking ID ::2230240 Symptom::HP 5.1 SP1 GLMQA test hit an assert "Unaligned reference fault in kernel" in internal testing. Description::We are trying to access gm_range members from msg directly, which are not 64-bit aligned. Resolution::Fixing the unaligned access fault by using bcopy and then accessing the struct members. Incidents from old Patches: --------------------------- NONE